给顾问 Rebecca Lee 的评价:

顾问给我提供了很有用的ps修改意见!强力推荐!

给服务的评价:

客服都很贴心~

简* avatar 简*
给顾问 Elana G 的评价:

Elana is such a wonderful advisor! She responds to me very quickly and provides lots of useful information on my CV. Highly recommend!

给服务的评价:

网站界面很友好,导师有任何更新和进展都会邮件通知,客服也很热心,不错噢

Richard avatar Richard
给顾问 Henry L 的评价:

The second edition of the revision is very professional, very helpful to me. it is lucky for me to get your help.

  • Henry L 回复 Richard

    Thank you very much for your kind review! - very best of luck with your application!

给服务的评价:

好!

Jingpu avatar Jingpu
给顾问 Angela T 的评价:

I feel much more confident now, and I can not wait to submit my revised motivation letter to the university! Language is a power, however, may hardly been stepped ahead for Chinese applicants. What you have done is of vital importance. Thank you!

给服务的评价:

非常好,客服也不错

Chen avatar Chen
给顾问 Kathleen P 的评价:

Thanks for Kathleen’s suggestions so that I can modify and finish my personal statement .She is professional and conscientious.

给服务的评价:

客服小姐姐超级可爱!

  • Nydia 回复 Chen

    嘻嘻嘻嘻

Ryan avatar Ryan
给顾问 Elizabeth L 的评价:

Excellent!

给服务的评价:

Nice!

Ryan avatar Ryan
给顾问 Henry L 的评价:

Good job!

  • Henry L 回复 Ryan

    Thank you very much for your kind review! - very best of luck with your application!

给服务的评价:

Nice platform!

Alex avatar Alex
给顾问 Stevon G 的评价:

Stevon is very warm and friendly, and his suggestions have helped me a lot. He is an excellent consultant.

给服务的评价:

服务高效、优质

贺*轩🔰 avatar 贺*轩🔰
给顾问 Jakob T 的评价:

Very nice

给服务的评价:

Very nice

给顾问 James I 的评价:

Thank you for being nice and patient! Thank you for your efficient and professional revision! ❤

给服务的评价:

小笛很有耐心,帮忙和顾问进行了高效沟通。提出了意见后,小笛帮忙给首席文书官反馈。

  • Nydia 回复 Zhang

    诶嘿嘿,下次有困难还找小笛鸭

给顾问 November M 的评价:

November is so professional and helpful. She is patient with my abundant questions, looks carefully at my program website to give instructions to me and clarifies my mistakes with her professional experience. Thank you so much for your help!

给服务的评价:

棒棒哒

Ted avatar Ted
给顾问 George J T 的评价:

It is super helpful! Thanks!

给服务的评价:

感觉不错,要是与顾问互动更充分一点就更好了

  • 芝士圈留学 Marco 回复 Ted

    下次如果顾问没有看到你的消息记得找俺们!!

Freya avatar Freya
给顾问 Kathleen P 的评价:

quick feedback and nice~ thank you so much!

给服务的评价:

nice

Haiyu avatar Haiyu
给顾问 George J T 的评价:

Patient and creative editor. He didn't change a lot the structure of my essays, but polished very well language and made essays much more logical.

给服务的评价:

这是我在芝士圈下的第二单了感觉还是很好

  • 芝士圈留学 Marco 回复 Haiyu

    嘻嘻嘻,希望你多少单都觉得好!

RUIZE avatar RUIZE
给顾问 Sarah Aciego 的评价:

She is the best!!!! super professional! very good!!!!

给服务的评价:

good!

RUIZE avatar RUIZE
给顾问 Sarah Aciego 的评价:

She is the best!!!! super professional! very good!!!!

给服务的评价:

perfect

RUIZE avatar RUIZE
给顾问 Tim D 的评价:

He is the best!!!! super professional! very good!!!!

给服务的评价:

perfect.

RUIZE avatar RUIZE
给顾问 Sarah N 的评价:

Don't even fit the words requirement. And just suddenly stop reply you for no reason. Are 350 words so hard to reach? Remove a whole sentence with blank?

  • Andy D 回复 RUIZE

    Dear Ruize,

    Thank you so much for taking the time to offer your reflections. I’m really glad you have had so many fruitful collaborations on our site. I’ve reviewed the details of this case. I want to give you some reassurance if I may.

    To begin, I want to reassure you about the document that you and Sarah produced together: You got a really good result. The document is high-quality and has been radically enhanced through the service process and is fit-for-purpose. I want to cover the two issues you’ve mentioned specifically in a little more detail:

    1. The word count. Sarah’s final draft was 326 words in length, not 350 words (the word limit), about 7% under the maximum. You don’t have to worry about this! Being under the limit (to a minor extent like this) does not mean there is a shortfall in quality. Indeed, being precisely up to the word limit is not necessarily desirable at all. Why? Because it is content that matters. What Sarah’s done, is help you to keep your words finely-tuned; she’s helped edit unnecessary or repeated material so the meaning is clear. It is not helpful to your application to add more words merely to hit a higher word count. The purpose of words is to convey meaning. If that meaning is conveyed by words elsewhere, then additional words distract from meaning and imply a lack of precision about purpose. Not desirable in this context! That brings me onto my next point, which is…

    2. The removed sentence. I have to tell you a couple of important things about this sentence. I hope you don’t mind! My intention here is to convey these things warmly; my goal is to reassure you about the document you received:

    (i) The meaning of the removed sentence was almost exactly the same as the preceding material. It was a bit superfluous, and thus detracted from the document’s quality.

    (ii) The removed sentence could be viewed as exhibiting a slightly “lyrical” quality. Now, I love lyrical writing myself, don’t get me wrong, but it must be deployed in apt contexts. If it’s out-of-place, readers sometimes interpret this as self-indulgence by the author. It’s where the famous advice by William Faulkner came from: “In writing, you must kill all your darlings.” Meaning: Sometimes these beautiful sentences we’ve lovingly created need to be cut for the sake of the reader. That’s why we have editors and advisors to help us when we write. Their job is to give us the reader’s perspective. And it’s tough. People get very attached to their sentences. I’m continuously battling this in my own writing, believe me! Now, Sarah’s judgement call was that (in addition to the meaning being conveyed elsewhere) the tone of this sentence wasn’t helpful to you in a professional document. I think she made the right call. But I want you to know: I understand why you might worry and I know why extra explanation is important for your peace of mind. Your peace of mind is very important to me—to everyone at ZHISHIQ. This brings me to my next point, which is…

    I agree with you that a prompt reply after Sarah saw your message would have been desirable. In mitigation, I’d say, she had already completed work on the document for you really quickly as you requested. She uploaded the document, she knew it was excellent: Job done. She didn’t see your final message about the 24 words until the application deadline had already expired (the document was completed on the day of the deadline, within 24 hours of your feedback!) We don’t require advisors to be glued to their screens. But we do ask that they respond to new messages within 24 hours of receiving them. In this case, Sarah’s reasoning was that the deadline had passed, which is why she didn’t get back to you promptly. If she’d had a full picture of your concerns, as I do now, I know she’d have given you a more thorough explanation, a little like mine above.

    I really want you to know that your work was prioritized by Sarah. She worked hard to provide a high-quality document ahead of schedule. She addressed all your needs as best she could. Given the above, we all deeply, deeply regret that you feel negative about the service.

    Andy Daum | CPO/ coFounder, ZHISHIQ.com

给服务的评价:

good.

RUIZE avatar RUIZE
给顾问 Sarah Aciego 的评价:

She is the best!!!! super professional! very good!!!!

给服务的评价:

perfect!

给顾问 Vivian W 的评价:

很负责专业的学姐,非常nice!

给服务的评价:

网站操作便捷明了,服务态度亲和。

给顾问 Bowen Lin 的评价:

Bowen逻辑超级清晰,言简意赅。解决好多我之前有疑惑的问题。推荐推荐~

给服务的评价:

很便利!

服务质量
5星
98.6%
4星
1%
3星
0.2%
2星
0.2%
1星
0%
注:数据来自用户真实评价,截止时间:2024-06-17